The role of religion in the foreign affairs of Sasanian Iran and the Later Roman Empire (330-630 A.D.)

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record Zouberi, Joan 2019-11-14T13:09:23Z 2019-11-14T13:09:23Z 2017
dc.identifier.citation Historia i Świat. 2017, nr 6, s. 121-132 pl
dc.identifier.issn 2299-2464
dc.description.abstract Religion’s role was prominent in the foreign relations of Byzantium and Iran. The religious element prevails throughout the entire struggle with Persia. The two empires were not just rivals on the battlefield. Along with the real war an ideological war was conducted between them, as both tried to convert people to their own religion. Zoroastrian Magi and Christian bishops became rivals in a war of propaganda where all means were used. When Constantine became Christian he created a golden opportunity to unite a wholeheartedly universalist religion and its abundance of scriptural authority and missionary impetus, with empire’s forces of political, military and economic expansion in order to create a genuine world empire. Constantine the Great was the first to use religion as a weapon to assimilate people to the Roman Empire. The dream of global domination could become a reality through the spread of Christianity. During the Sasanian era Iran was Zoroastrianized in great extent. The doctrine of Zarthustra became the privileged religion and developed into a supporting pillar of Sasanian kingship. Persecutions of Christians in Iran followed Constantine’s the Great proclamation of being the leader of all Christians in the oikoumeni. Church historians accused the Zoroastrian priests called Magi in the West as responsible for tortures and death penalties against the Christians of Iran, while Martyrologies illustrated them as having diabolical forces and immoral practices in their private lives. On the contrary secular Byzantine historians praised them as simple priests and holy men who lived in peace following their own customs. Roman propaganda, through history writing, presented the shahs Yazdegerd I, Xusrō I, and Xusrō II as having converted to Christianity or at least as Christian sympathizers. The impossibility of Persian subjects existing under the rule of any Roman prelate, had decreed the independence of the Persian Church. It was a common belief that Christian Orthodoxy was loyalty to the Roman Emperor, not to Christ, and heresy was not the display of a special variety of unchristian spirit, but an offence against the Roman State order. Christians of Persia were soon obliged to follow the customs of their own country. The King of Kings would always have the last voice, and frequently the first also in the choice of Catholicos. Byzantine historians often proceed to a religious mythmaking to justify the emperors’ policy towards the Persian rulers. During the sixth and seventh centuries religion propaganda was used in extent by both countries. In Byzantium during Heraclius’ reign we can trace a tendency to interpret events in terms of biblical prototypes. pl
dc.language.iso en pl
dc.rights Uznanie autorstwa-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska *
dc.rights.uri *
dc.subject Byzantium pl
dc.subject Christianity pl
dc.subject Persia 4-7th century pl
dc.subject Roman Empire pl
dc.subject Sasanids (family) pl
dc.subject Zoroastrianism pl
dc.title The role of religion in the foreign affairs of Sasanian Iran and the Later Roman Empire (330-630 A.D.) pl
dc.type Article pl

Files in this item

The following license files are associated with this item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Uznanie autorstwa-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Uznanie autorstwa-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska

Search DSpace

Advanced Search


My Account